Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs FSPHX
FSHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. FSHCX (913M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FSHCX (0.59) vs FSPHX (0.01). FSHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FSHCX (39 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FSHCX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSHCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.08 vs. FSHCX (-17.97). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. FSHCX (-14.34).
| FSHCX | FSPHX | FSHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.516 | 13.028 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 913M | 6.67B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.01 | 4,009% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.97 | -2.08 | 864% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.87 | 7.82 | -305% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.34 | -9.00 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.58 | 40.40 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers