Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RTNCX
FSGEX vs RTNCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RTNCX
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$18.40
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.1B
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
Price$14.14
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.17B
FSGEX vs RTNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RTNCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Buy and RTNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 62.1B vs. RTNCX (5.17B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: FSGEX (2.31) vs RTNCX (0.71). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RTNCX: FSGEX (16 years) vs RTNCX (11 years). RTNCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX (0) and RTNCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.22 vs. RTNCX (21.43). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 46.88 vs. RTNCX (29.24).
| FSGEX | RTNCX | FSGEX / RTNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.07 | 0% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.14 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.914 | 25.760 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.1B | 5.17B | 1,200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.31 | 0.71 | 324% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.22 | 21.43 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.82 | 39.95 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.88 | 29.24 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.85 | 61.34 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement