FSFG
Price
$30.50
Change
+$0.85 (+2.87%)
Updated
Oct 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
206.88M
3 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
UBFO
Price
$8.79
Change
-$0.21 (-2.33%)
Updated
Oct 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
158.02M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSFG vs UBFO

Header iconFSFG vs UBFO Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs UBFOBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$30.50
Change+$0.85 (+2.87%)
Volume$200
Capitalization206.88M
United Security Bancshares
Price$8.79
Change-$0.21 (-2.33%)
Volume$400
Capitalization158.02M
FSFG vs UBFO Comparison Chart in %
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBFO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. UBFO commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Hold and UBFO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (FSFG: $29.65 vs. UBFO: $9.00)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and UBFO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 46% vs. UBFO: 170%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $206.88M vs. UBFO: $158.02M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $206.88M. UBFO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $158.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBFO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UBFO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the long-term than UBFO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBFO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBFO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBFO is a better buy in the short-term than FSFG.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.56% price change this week, while UBFO (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.05% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFG($207M) has a higher market cap than UBFO($158M). UBFO has higher P/E ratio than FSFG: UBFO (13.85) vs FSFG (9.56). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: 13.727 vs. UBFO (-6.018). UBFO has more cash in the bank: 44M vs. FSFG (18.6M). UBFO has less debt than FSFG: UBFO (14.6M) vs FSFG (464M). FSFG has higher revenues than UBFO: FSFG (80.6M) vs UBFO (52.3M).
FSFGUBFOFSFG / UBFO
Capitalization207M158M131%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.727-6.018-228%
P/E Ratio9.5613.8569%
Revenue80.6M52.3M154%
Total Cash18.6M44M42%
Total Debt464M14.6M3,178%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs UBFO: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
UBFO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4423
SMR RATING
1..100
4757
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8512
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSFG's Valuation (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBFO (68). This means that FSFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBFO’s over the last 12 months.

UBFO's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (44). This means that UBFO’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's SMR Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UBFO (57). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to UBFO’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UBFO (52). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to UBFO’s over the last 12 months.

UBFO's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSFG (85). This means that UBFO’s stock grew significantly faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGUBFO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBFO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSYCF0.01N/A
+10.24%
Psyched Wellness Ltd.
HOCFF292.601.51
+0.52%
Hochtief AG
HFBK37.710.01
+0.03%
Harford Bank
KOTMF11.95N/A
N/A
Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
INDHF24.45N/A
N/A
Indus Holding AG

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
+1.40%
SHBI - FSFG
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
FUNC - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
TCBI - FSFG
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
UBFO - FSFG
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.39%
BY - FSFG
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
More

UBFO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBFO has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UBFO jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBFO
1D Price
Change %
UBFO100%
+5.39%
UCB - UBFO
69%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
SHBI - UBFO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
CWBC - UBFO
68%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
WTFC - UBFO
67%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
AUB - UBFO
67%
Closely correlated
+3.04%
More