FSFG
Price
$31.69
Change
-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
221.46M
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OCFC
Price
$19.49
Change
+$0.06 (+0.31%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.12B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSFG vs OCFC

Header iconFSFG vs OCFC Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs OCFCBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$31.69
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$100
Capitalization221.46M
OceanFirst Financial
Price$19.49
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
Volume$5.45K
Capitalization1.12B
FSFG vs OCFC Comparison Chart in %
FSFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OCFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. OCFC commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a StrongBuy and OCFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FSFG: $31.70 vs. OCFC: $19.43)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and OCFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 43% vs. OCFC: 64%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $221.46M vs. OCFC: $1.12B
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $221.46M. OCFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOCFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OCFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the long-term than OCFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OCFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSFG and OCFC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.03% price change this week, while OCFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

OCFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCFC($1.12B) has a higher market cap than FSFG($221M). OCFC has higher P/E ratio than FSFG: OCFC (14.95) vs FSFG (9.55). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: 21.590 vs. OCFC (12.429). FSFG has less debt than OCFC: FSFG (464M) vs OCFC (1.14B). OCFC has higher revenues than FSFG: OCFC (385M) vs FSFG (80.6M).
FSFGOCFCFSFG / OCFC
Capitalization221M1.12B20%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.59012.429174%
P/E Ratio9.5514.9564%
Revenue80.6M385M21%
Total Cash18.6MN/A-
Total Debt464M1.14B41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs OCFC: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
OCFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2022
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4857
SMR RATING
1..100
4622
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5010

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSFG's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (60) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (57) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

OCFC's SMR Rating (22) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (49) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

OCFC's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSFG (87) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew significantly faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGOCFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OCFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMBKX54.341.19
+2.24%
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
JGERX13.630.08
+0.59%
JHancock Global Equity R2
FLCSX63.920.35
+0.55%
Fidelity Large Cap Stock
WEBAX9.460.03
+0.32%
TETON Westwood Balanced AAA
CSFCX55.040.08
+0.15%
Cohen & Steers Global Realty C

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
+2.52%
NWBI - FSFG
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
SHBI - FSFG
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
CFFN - FSFG
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
BY - FSFG
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
OCFC - FSFG
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
More

OCFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCFC has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCFC jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCFC
1D Price
Change %
OCFC100%
+1.83%
HOPE - OCFC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
DCOM - OCFC
83%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
FMBH - OCFC
82%
Closely correlated
+4.13%
UBSI - OCFC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
PGC - OCFC
82%
Closely correlated
+2.62%
More