FSFG
Price
$30.95
Change
-$0.37 (-1.18%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
238.37M
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HCBC
Price
$36.40
Change
+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
36.63M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSFG vs HCBC

Header iconFSFG vs HCBC Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs HCBCBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$30.95
Change-$0.37 (-1.18%)
Volume$36.09K
Capitalization238.37M
High Country Ban
Price$36.40
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Volume$433
Capitalization36.63M
FSFG vs HCBC Comparison Chart in %
FSFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HCBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. HCBC commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a StrongBuy and HCBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (FSFG: $33.98 vs. HCBC: $36.40)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and HCBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 496% vs. HCBC: 12%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $238.37M vs. HCBC: $36.63M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $238.37M. HCBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $36.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHCBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HCBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the long-term than HCBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HCBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the short-term than HCBC.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.56% price change this week, while HCBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFG($238M) has a higher market cap than HCBC($36.6M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than HCBC: FSFG (10.23) vs HCBC (8.47). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: 6.654 vs. HCBC (-0.247). FSFG has more cash in the bank: 16M vs. HCBC (9.62M). HCBC has less debt than FSFG: HCBC (43.7M) vs FSFG (464M). FSFG has higher revenues than HCBC: FSFG (84.1M) vs HCBC (24M).
FSFGHCBCFSFG / HCBC
Capitalization238M36.6M650%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.654-0.247-2,698%
P/E Ratio10.238.47121%
Revenue84.1M24M350%
Total Cash16M9.62M166%
Total Debt464M43.7M1,062%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs HCBC: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
HCBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3017
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5162
SMR RATING
1..100
4767
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3378
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSFG's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (46) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (62) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's SMR Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (67) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (48) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCBC (78) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGHCBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HCBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFBP19.450.67
+3.57%
M&F Bancorp, Inc.
JEHLY46.41N/A
N/A
Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.
SWDCF3.60N/A
N/A
SWEDENCARE AB
SRKE0.17N/A
N/A
Strake Inc.
IFJPY22.93-0.31
-1.33%
Informa Plc.

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
N/A
NWBI - FSFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
HFWA - FSFG
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
TRMK - FSFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
UMBF - FSFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
OSBC - FSFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More

HCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCBC and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCBC and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCBC
1D Price
Change %
HCBC100%
+0.14%
MCHB - HCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
BSBK - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
LSFG - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWG - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
FSFG - HCBC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More