FSFG
Price
$27.30
Change
+$0.27 (+1.00%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
189.76M
45 days until earnings call
HCBC
Price
$31.74
Change
+$0.75 (+2.42%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
31.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSFG vs HCBC

Header iconFSFG vs HCBC Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs HCBCBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$27.30
Change+$0.27 (+1.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization189.76M
High Country Ban
Price$31.74
Change+$0.75 (+2.42%)
Volume$310
Capitalization31.9M
FSFG vs HCBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. HCBC commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Buy and HCBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FSFG: $27.03 vs. HCBC: $31.74)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and HCBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 42% vs. HCBC: 15%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $189.76M vs. HCBC: $31.9M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $189.76M. HCBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $31.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the long-term than HCBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCBC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HCBC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCBC is a better buy in the short-term than FSFG.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while HCBC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFG($190M) has a higher market cap than HCBC($31.9M). HCBC has higher P/E ratio than FSFG: HCBC (10.58) vs FSFG (8.77). HCBC YTD gains are higher at: 8.425 vs. FSFG (3.064). FSFG has more cash in the bank: 20.2M vs. HCBC (12.8M). HCBC has less debt than FSFG: HCBC (34.5M) vs FSFG (464M).
FSFGHCBCFSFG / HCBC
Capitalization190M31.9M596%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.0648.42536%
P/E Ratio8.7710.5883%
Revenue80.6MN/A-
Total Cash20.2M12.8M158%
Total Debt464M34.5M1,345%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs HCBC: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
HCBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5265
SMR RATING
1..100
4772
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9530
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSFG's Valuation (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (58) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (65) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's SMR Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (72) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (50) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

HCBC's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSFG (95) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGHCBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWLIF0.19N/A
+2.11%
AMERIWEST CRITICAL METALS INC.
SCHYF2.61N/A
N/A
Sands China Ltd
YHEKF1.60N/A
N/A
YEAHKA LTD.
WAWIF9.28N/A
N/A
Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA
APCFF0.06N/A
N/A
ATLAS PEARLS LTD

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-2.17%
SHBI - FSFG
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
FUNC - FSFG
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
NWBI - FSFG
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
AUB - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
UBSI - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
More

HCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCBC and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCBC and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCBC
1D Price
Change %
HCBC100%
N/A
MCHB - HCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
BXRBF - HCBC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWG - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
FSFG - HCBC
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
HCBN - HCBC
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More