Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSENX vs ICWIX
FSENX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSENX vs. ICWIX commentary
Feb 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSENX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 3.06B vs. ICWIX (175M). FSENX pays higher dividends than ICWIX: FSENX (1.70) vs ICWIX (0.99). FSENX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FSENX (45 years) vs ICWIX (10 years). ICWIX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.34 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FSENX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.78 vs. FSENX (23.10). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 204.65 vs. ICWIX (143.96).
| FSENX | ICWIX | FSENX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.829 | 14.056 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.06B | 175M | 1,746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 0.99 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.10 | 28.78 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.86 | 54.93 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 204.65 | 143.96 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement