FSEN
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
1.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRIN
Price
$16.26
Change
+$0.15 (+0.93%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSEN vs TRIN

Header iconFSEN vs TRIN Comparison
Open Charts FSEN vs TRINBanner chart's image
FS Energy & Power Fund
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$458
Capitalization1.07B
Trinity Capital
Price$16.26
Change+$0.15 (+0.93%)
Volume$1.56M
Capitalization1.23B
FSEN vs TRIN Comparison Chart in %
FSEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSEN vs. TRIN commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSEN is a Hold and TRIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (FSEN: $13.49 vs. TRIN: $16.26)
Brand notoriety: FSEN and TRIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSEN: 100% vs. TRIN: 154%
Market capitalization -- FSEN: $1.07B vs. TRIN: $1.23B
FSEN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.07B. TRIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRIN is a better buy in the long-term than FSEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSEN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSEN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TRIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRIN is a better buy in the short-term than FSEN.

Price Growth

FSEN (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

TRIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.21% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIN($1.23B) has a higher market cap than FSEN($1.07B). FSEN has higher P/E ratio than TRIN: FSEN (12.04) vs TRIN (7.36). TRIN YTD gains are higher at: 12.173 vs. FSEN (0.000). FSEN has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. TRIN (9.28M). FSEN has less debt than TRIN: FSEN (398M) vs TRIN (1.18B). TRIN has higher revenues than FSEN: TRIN (209M) vs FSEN (107M).
FSENTRINFSEN / TRIN
Capitalization1.07B1.23B87%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00012.173-
P/E Ratio12.047.36164%
Revenue107M209M51%
Total Cash369M9.28M3,978%
Total Debt398M1.18B34%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSENTRIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UMPIX77.911.82
+2.39%
ProFunds UltraMid Cap Inv
TSEMX17.790.19
+1.08%
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr Y
BRLVX26.210.14
+0.54%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R5
DEMAX34.170.16
+0.47%
Nomura Emerging Markets A
LEISX20.550.03
+0.15%
Federated Hermes Strategic Div Gr IS

FSEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSEN and OWL have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSEN and OWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSEN
1D Price
Change %
FSEN100%
N/A
OWL - FSEN
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
GCMG - FSEN
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
SSSS - FSEN
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
STEP - FSEN
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
TRIN - FSEN
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
More

TRIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRIN has been closely correlated with CGBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRIN jumps, then CGBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRIN
1D Price
Change %
TRIN100%
+2.01%
CGBD - TRIN
74%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
BCSF - TRIN
69%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
GSBD - TRIN
69%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
TSLX - TRIN
69%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
MAIN - TRIN
69%
Closely correlated
+3.10%
More