FSEN
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
1.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRIN
Price
$14.77
Change
+$0.21 (+1.44%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSEN vs TRIN

Header iconFSEN vs TRIN Comparison
Open Charts FSEN vs TRINBanner chart's image
FS Energy & Power Fund
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$458
Capitalization1.07B
Trinity Capital
Price$14.77
Change+$0.21 (+1.44%)
Volume$631.03K
Capitalization1.12B
FSEN vs TRIN Comparison Chart in %
FSEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSEN vs. TRIN commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSEN is a Hold and TRIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FSEN: $13.49 vs. TRIN: $14.56)
Brand notoriety: FSEN and TRIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSEN: 100% vs. TRIN: 57%
Market capitalization -- FSEN: $1.07B vs. TRIN: $1.12B
FSEN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.07B. TRIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $167.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSEN and TRIN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSEN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSEN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRIN is a better buy in the short-term than FSEN.

Price Growth

FSEN (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRIN (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

TRIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIN($1.12B) and FSEN($1.07B) have the same market capitalization . FSEN has higher P/E ratio than TRIN: FSEN (12.04) vs TRIN (6.68). TRIN YTD gains are higher at: 11.388 vs. FSEN (3.756). FSEN has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. TRIN (24.2M). FSEN has less debt than TRIN: FSEN (398M) vs TRIN (1.05B). TRIN has higher revenues than FSEN: TRIN (203M) vs FSEN (107M).
FSENTRINFSEN / TRIN
Capitalization1.07B1.12B96%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.75611.38833%
P/E Ratio12.046.68180%
Revenue107M203M53%
Total Cash369M24.2M1,525%
Total Debt398M1.05B38%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSENTRIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBPIX52.93N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Instl
HFEDX59.50N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson European Focus D
QRLVX36.00N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value R
MSJSX20.42N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance R6
PMICX11.30N/A
N/A
Putnam Multi-Asset Income C

FSEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSEN and OWL have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSEN and OWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSEN
1D Price
Change %
FSEN100%
N/A
OWL - FSEN
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
SSSS - FSEN
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
GCMG - FSEN
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
TRIN - FSEN
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
STEP - FSEN
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
More

TRIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRIN has been closely correlated with CGBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRIN jumps, then CGBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRIN
1D Price
Change %
TRIN100%
-0.14%
CGBD - TRIN
71%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
BCSF - TRIN
71%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
TSLX - TRIN
70%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
PFLT - TRIN
69%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
MAIN - TRIN
68%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
More