Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSEAX vs IASMX
FSEAX vs IASMX Comparison
Open Charts FSEAX vs IASMX
Fidelity Emerging Asia
Price$70.38
Change+$0.19 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus
Price$19.37
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.76M
FSEAX vs IASMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSEAX vs. IASMX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSEAX is a Hold and IASMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSEAX has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. IASMX (11.8M). IASMX pays higher dividends than FSEAX: IASMX (0.95) vs FSEAX (0.22). FSEAX was incepted earlier than IASMX: FSEAX (33 years) vs IASMX (30 years). IASMX (2.50) is less costly to investors than FSEAX (0.65). FSEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. IASMX (6.18). FSEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IASMX: FSEAX (0) vs IASMX (5000). FSEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.07 vs. IASMX (30.89). FSEAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.16 vs. IASMX (-21.53).
| FSEAX | IASMX | FSEAX / IASMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.99 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.50 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.963 | 4.816 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 11.8M | 12,737% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.95 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.07 | 30.89 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.13 | 24.74 | 320% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.16 | -21.53 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.99 | 64.89 | 248% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement