FSEA
Price
$12.09
Change
-$0.10 (-0.82%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.86M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RF
Price
$26.21
Change
+$0.80 (+3.15%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.21B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSEA vs RF

Header iconFSEA vs RF Comparison
Open Charts FSEA vs RFBanner chart's image
First Seacoast Ban
Price$12.09
Change-$0.10 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization57.86M
Regions Financial
Price$26.21
Change+$0.80 (+3.15%)
Volume$300.98K
Capitalization22.21B
FSEA vs RF Comparison Chart in %
FSEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSEA vs. RF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSEA is a Hold and RF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FSEA: $12.19 vs. RF: $25.41)
Brand notoriety: FSEA: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSEA: 8% vs. RF: 15%
Market capitalization -- FSEA: $57.86M vs. RF: $22.21B
FSEA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $57.86M. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSEA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSEA and RF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSEA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSEA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than FSEA.

Price Growth

FSEA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.01% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($22.2B) has a higher market cap than FSEA($57.9M). FSEA YTD gains are higher at: 21.414 vs. RF (11.554). FSEA has less debt than RF: FSEA (21.3M) vs RF (5.28B). RF has higher revenues than FSEA: RF (7.29B) vs FSEA (13.9M).
FSEARFFSEA / RF
Capitalization57.9M22.2B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.41411.554185%
P/E RatioN/A11.16-
Revenue13.9M7.29B0%
Total CashN/A3.25B-
Total Debt21.3M5.28B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSEA vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
FSEA
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5330
SMR RATING
1..100
917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2076
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (71) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FSEA (89) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FSEA (53) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSEA (91) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

FSEA's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as RF (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

FSEA's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RF (76) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSEARF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SECT63.920.26
+0.41%
Main Sector Rotation ETF
GAEM26.610.06
+0.22%
Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF
PAB42.940.07
+0.16%
PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF
GGRW35.67N/A
N/A
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF
NCV15.32-0.07
-0.45%
Virtus Convertible & Income Fund

FSEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSEA has been loosely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSEA jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSEA
1D Price
Change %
FSEA100%
-1.06%
RF - FSEA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
KRNY - FSEA
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
HTBK - FSEA
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TRST - FSEA
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
PFBC - FSEA
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+0.32%
FITB - RF
80%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
HBAN - RF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
PNC - RF
78%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
MTB - RF
77%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
FNB - RF
77%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
More