FSEA
Price
$11.02
Change
-$0.10 (-0.90%)
Updated
Jun 16, 01:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
42.93M
PRK
Price
$157.97
Change
+$0.54 (+0.34%)
Updated
Jun 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.19B
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSEA vs PRK

Header iconFSEA vs PRK Comparison
Open Charts FSEA vs PRKBanner chart's image
First Seacoast Ban
Price$11.02
Change-$0.10 (-0.90%)
Volume$500
Capitalization42.93M
Park National
Price$157.97
Change+$0.54 (+0.34%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.19B
FSEA vs PRK Comparison Chart
Loading...
PRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSEA vs. PRK commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSEA is a StrongBuy and PRK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FSEA: $11.12 vs. PRK: $157.43)
Brand notoriety: FSEA and PRK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSEA: 57% vs. PRK: 83%
Market capitalization -- FSEA: $42.93M vs. PRK: $2.19B
FSEA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $42.93M. PRK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSEA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSEA is a better buy in the long-term than PRK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PRK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FSEA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.63% price change this week, while PRK (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRK is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.75% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRK($2.19B) has a higher market cap than FSEA($42.9M). FSEA has higher P/E ratio than PRK: FSEA (35.97) vs PRK (16.82). FSEA YTD gains are higher at: 10.719 vs. PRK (-6.999). FSEA has less debt than PRK: FSEA (44.9M) vs PRK (426M). PRK has higher revenues than FSEA: PRK (466M) vs FSEA (13.6M).
FSEAPRKFSEA / PRK
Capitalization42.9M2.19B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.719-6.999-153%
P/E Ratio35.9716.82214%
Revenue13.6M466M3%
Total CashN/A160M-
Total Debt44.9M426M11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSEA vs PRK: Fundamental Ratings
FSEA
PRK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3725
SMR RATING
1..100
8714
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2361
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSEA's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as PRK (93) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew similarly to PRK’s over the last 12 months.

PRK's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FSEA (37) in the null industry. This means that PRK’s stock grew similarly to FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

PRK's SMR Rating (14) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSEA (87) in the null industry. This means that PRK’s stock grew significantly faster than FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

FSEA's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as PRK (59) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew similarly to PRK’s over the last 12 months.

FSEA's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRK (61) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMTB42.99-0.13
-0.30%
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
KSPY26.07-0.12
-0.47%
KraneShares Hedgeye Hedged Eq Idx ETF
BNDI46.73-0.24
-0.50%
NEOS Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
ETJ8.89-0.05
-0.56%
Eaton Vance Risk - Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
EXG8.68-0.07
-0.80%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund

FSEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSEA and ISTR have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSEA and ISTR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSEA
1D Price
Change %
FSEA100%
+0.86%
ISTR - FSEA
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
HOMB - FSEA
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
RF - FSEA
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
PRK - FSEA
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
FITB - FSEA
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.57%
More

PRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRK has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PRK jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRK
1D Price
Change %
PRK100%
-3.34%
WSFS - PRK
87%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
NWBI - PRK
87%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
PEBO - PRK
86%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
TCBK - PRK
86%
Closely correlated
-2.97%
CTBI - PRK
86%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
More