Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs RYBCX
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs RYBCX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$93.66
Change+$0.56 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.4M
Rydex Basic Materials C
Price$63.89
Change+$1.07 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.31M
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. RYBCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and RYBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. RYBCX (25.3M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than RYBCX: FSDPX (0.88) vs RYBCX (0.05). FSDPX was incepted earlier than RYBCX: FSDPX (39 years) vs RYBCX (24 years). RYBCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RYBCX (51.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBCX: FSDPX (0) vs RYBCX (2500). RYBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.38 vs. FSDPX (-0.56). FSDPX (37.16) and RYBCX (36.76) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSDPX | RYBCX | FSDPX / RYBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.447 | 21.279 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 25.3M | 2,937% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.05 | 1,633% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.56 | 1.38 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.78 | 14.96 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.16 | 36.76 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.53 | 88.18 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement