Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs RYBCX
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs RYBCX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$89.20
Change-$0.88 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets680.33M
Rydex Basic Materials C
Price$64.71
Change-$0.74 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.52M
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. RYBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and RYBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 680M vs. RYBCX (27.5M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than RYBCX: FSDPX (0.93) vs RYBCX (0.05). FSDPX was incepted earlier than RYBCX: FSDPX (39 years) vs RYBCX (25 years). RYBCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RYBCX (51.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBCX: FSDPX (0) vs RYBCX (2500). RYBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.99 vs. FSDPX (-8.80). RYBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.22 vs. FSDPX (22.18).
| FSDPX | RYBCX | FSDPX / RYBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.187 | 22.836 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 680M | 27.5M | 2,473% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.05 | 1,732% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.80 | -1.99 | 443% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.33 | 8.78 | -106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.18 | 28.22 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.45 | 92.26 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers