Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs RYBCX
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs RYBCX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$91.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets712.41M
Rydex Basic Materials C
Price$61.11
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17M
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. RYBCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and RYBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 712M vs. RYBCX (24.2M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than RYBCX: FSDPX (0.93) vs RYBCX (0.06). FSDPX was incepted earlier than RYBCX: FSDPX (39 years) vs RYBCX (24 years). RYBCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RYBCX (51.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBCX: FSDPX (0) vs RYBCX (2500). FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.53 vs. RYBCX (-4.09). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 36.38 vs. RYBCX (33.20).
| FSDPX | RYBCX | FSDPX / RYBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.40 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.948 | 16.002 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 712M | 24.2M | 2,942% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.06 | 1,591% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.53 | -4.09 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.53 | -0.14 | 3,954% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.38 | 33.20 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.41 | 69.06 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement