Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs RYBCX
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs RYBCX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$92.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.08M
Rydex Basic Materials C
Price$59.98
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.65M
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. RYBCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a StrongBuy and RYBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 729M vs. RYBCX (26.6M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than RYBCX: FSDPX (0.92) vs RYBCX (0.06). FSDPX was incepted earlier than RYBCX: FSDPX (39 years) vs RYBCX (24 years). RYBCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RYBCX (49.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBCX: FSDPX (0) vs RYBCX (2500). FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.51 vs. RYBCX (-4.45). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 51.04 vs. RYBCX (43.28).
| FSDPX | RYBCX | FSDPX / RYBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.40 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.305 | 13.857 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 729M | 26.6M | 2,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.06 | 1,570% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.51 | -4.45 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.97 | 9.67 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.04 | 43.28 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.08 | 56.35 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement