Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs RYBCX
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs RYBCX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$92.84
Change+$1.10 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.4M
Rydex Basic Materials C
Price$64.83
Change+$0.94 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.41M
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. RYBCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and RYBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. RYBCX (25.4M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than RYBCX: FSDPX (0.88) vs RYBCX (0.05). FSDPX was incepted earlier than RYBCX: FSDPX (39 years) vs RYBCX (24 years). RYBCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RYBCX (51.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBCX: FSDPX (0) vs RYBCX (2500). RYBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.18 vs. FSDPX (-9.19). RYBCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.05 vs. FSDPX (41.68).
| FSDPX | RYBCX | FSDPX / RYBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.471 | 23.064 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 25.4M | 2,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.05 | 1,633% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.19 | -6.18 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.09 | 29.91 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.68 | 44.05 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.92 | 111.49 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement