Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs MCGRX
FSDPX vs MCGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs MCGRX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$93.40
Change-$1.31 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.09M
BlackRock Natural Resources Inv C
Price$18.46
Change+$0.10 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.05M
FSDPX vs MCGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. MCGRX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and MCGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 693M vs. MCGRX (160M). MCGRX pays higher dividends than FSDPX: MCGRX (3.39) vs FSDPX (0.90). FSDPX was incepted earlier than MCGRX: FSDPX (39 years) vs MCGRX (31 years). MCGRX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). MCGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGRX: FSDPX (0) vs MCGRX (1000). MCGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.35 vs. FSDPX (9.20). MCGRX return over 5 years is better than : 27.90 vs. FSDPX (17.76).
| FSDPX | MCGRX | FSDPX / MCGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.88 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.88 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.138 | 12.285 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 693M | 160M | 433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 3.39 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 12.35 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.45 | -2.34 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.76 | 27.90 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.06 | -24.65 | -167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers