Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs INRSX
FSDPX vs INRSX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs INRSX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$94.08
Change+$0.42 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.4M
Macquarie Natural Resources R6
Price$19.05
Change+$0.25 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets184.62M
FSDPX vs INRSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. INRSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and INRSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. INRSX (185M). INRSX pays higher dividends than FSDPX: INRSX (4.74) vs FSDPX (0.88). FSDPX was incepted earlier than INRSX: FSDPX (39 years) vs INRSX (11 years). INRSX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. INRSX (47.00). FSDPX (0) and INRSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. INRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.83 vs. FSDPX (0.95). INRSX return over 5 years is better than : 99.05 vs. FSDPX (37.04).
| FSDPX | INRSX | FSDPX / INRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.95 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.10 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.447 | 21.492 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 185M | 402% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 4.74 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.95 | 23.83 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.01 | 21.62 | 0% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.04 | 99.05 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.79 | 60.34 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement