Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs IGNAX
FSDPX vs IGNAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs IGNAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$91.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets712.41M
Macquarie Natural Resources A
Price$17.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.47M
FSDPX vs IGNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. IGNAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and IGNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 712M vs. IGNAX (177M). IGNAX pays higher dividends than FSDPX: IGNAX (5.14) vs FSDPX (0.93). FSDPX was incepted earlier than IGNAX: FSDPX (39 years) vs IGNAX (29 years). IGNAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. IGNAX (47.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than IGNAX: FSDPX (0) vs IGNAX (1000). IGNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. FSDPX (-3.53). IGNAX return over 5 years is better than : 79.02 vs. FSDPX (36.38).
| FSDPX | IGNAX | FSDPX / IGNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.68 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.948 | 14.842 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 712M | 177M | 402% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 5.14 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.53 | 11.51 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.53 | 14.34 | -39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.38 | 79.02 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.41 | 32.14 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement