Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBMX
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBMX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$92.66
Change+$1.39 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets737.92M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Instl
Price$20.24
Change+$0.65 (+3.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.03M
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBMX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and ICBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 738M vs. ICBMX (124M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: FSDPX (0.88) vs ICBMX (0.66). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBMX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBMX (28 years). ICBMX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBMX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBMX (1000). ICBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. FSDPX (-10.50). ICBMX return over 5 years is better than : 62.17 vs. FSDPX (30.14).
| FSDPX | ICBMX | FSDPX / ICBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.603 | 14.028 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 738M | 124M | 595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.66 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.50 | 4.10 | -256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.99 | 18.77 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.14 | 62.17 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.90 | 69.76 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement