Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBMX
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBMX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$93.40
Change-$1.31 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.09M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Instl
Price$18.67
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.49M
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBMX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and ICBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 693M vs. ICBMX (123M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: FSDPX (0.90) vs ICBMX (0.70). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBMX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBMX (29 years). ICBMX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBMX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBMX (1000). FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.73 vs. ICBMX (7.23). ICBMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.44 vs. FSDPX (19.41).
| FSDPX | ICBMX | FSDPX / ICBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.696 | 8.673 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 693M | 123M | 563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.70 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.73 | 7.23 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.94 | 17.34 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.41 | 40.44 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.04 | 78.52 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement