Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBMX
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBMX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$88.40
Change-$0.80 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets719.5M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Instl
Price$16.59
Change-$0.29 (-1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.19M
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBMX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and ICBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 720M vs. ICBMX (113M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: FSDPX (0.94) vs ICBMX (0.79). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBMX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBMX (28 years). ICBMX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBMX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBMX (1000). ICBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.76 vs. FSDPX (-10.26). ICBMX return over 5 years is better than : 67.72 vs. FSDPX (52.33).
| FSDPX | ICBMX | FSDPX / ICBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.188 | -3.434 | -151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 720M | 113M | 637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.79 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.26 | -7.76 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.30 | -2.30 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.33 | 67.72 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.92 | 19.59 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers