Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBMX
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBMX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$92.84
Change+$1.10 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.4M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Instl
Price$19.57
Change+$0.34 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.64M
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBMX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and ICBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. ICBMX (125M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: FSDPX (0.88) vs ICBMX (0.68). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBMX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBMX (28 years). ICBMX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBMX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBMX (1000). ICBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.32 vs. FSDPX (-9.19). ICBMX return over 5 years is better than : 77.29 vs. FSDPX (41.68).
| FSDPX | ICBMX | FSDPX / ICBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.471 | 13.912 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 125M | 594% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.68 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.19 | 5.32 | -173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.09 | 26.95 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.68 | 77.29 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.92 | 84.70 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement