Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBAX
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$92.99
Change+$2.22 (+2.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.09M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$18.31
Change+$0.31 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.44M
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBAX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and ICBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 693M vs. ICBAX (124M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FSDPX (0.90) vs ICBAX (0.51). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBAX (15 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). ICBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.04 vs. FSDPX (-7.07). ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.85 vs. FSDPX (17.94).
| FSDPX | ICBAX | FSDPX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.008 | 8.536 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 693M | 124M | 559% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.51 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.07 | 2.04 | -347% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.12 | 15.41 | -53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.94 | 38.85 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.98 | 66.35 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers