Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBAX
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$92.41
Change+$0.47 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.08M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$17.76
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.78M
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and ICBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 729M vs. ICBAX (121M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FSDPX (0.92) vs ICBAX (0.55). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBAX (15 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). ICBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.38 vs. FSDPX (-4.47). ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 65.56 vs. FSDPX (40.21).
| FSDPX | ICBAX | FSDPX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.960 | 5.276 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 729M | 121M | 602% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.55 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.47 | -2.38 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.02 | 6.37 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.21 | 65.56 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.71 | 39.11 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement