Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBAX
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$91.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets712.41M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$17.62
Change-$0.10 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.85M
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and ICBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 712M vs. ICBAX (119M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FSDPX (0.93) vs ICBAX (0.53). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBAX (15 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). ICBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.08 vs. FSDPX (-3.53). ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.78 vs. FSDPX (36.38).
| FSDPX | ICBAX | FSDPX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.948 | 4.446 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 712M | 119M | 598% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.53 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.53 | 0.08 | -4,527% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.53 | -2.46 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.38 | 56.78 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.41 | 38.92 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement