Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBAX
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$91.27
Change-$0.53 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets737.92M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$19.20
Change-$0.17 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.03M
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and ICBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 738M vs. ICBAX (124M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FSDPX (0.88) vs ICBAX (0.48). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBAX (15 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). ICBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.67 vs. FSDPX (-10.50). ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.48 vs. FSDPX (30.14).
| FSDPX | ICBAX | FSDPX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.603 | 13.811 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 738M | 124M | 595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.48 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.50 | 3.67 | -286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.99 | 17.40 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.14 | 59.48 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.90 | 64.60 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement