Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDIX vs LCMNX
FSDIX vs LCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSDIX vs LCMNX
Fidelity Strategic Dividend & Income
Price$17.79
Change+$0.08 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Miller Income C
Price$8.90
Change+$0.05 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.55M
FSDIX vs LCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDIX vs. LCMNX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDIX is a Buy and LCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDIX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. LCMNX (172M). LCMNX pays higher dividends than FSDIX: LCMNX (3.59) vs FSDIX (2.44). FSDIX was incepted earlier than LCMNX: FSDIX (22 years) vs LCMNX (11 years). LCMNX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FSDIX (0.63). LCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FSDIX (36.00). FSDIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCMNX: FSDIX (0) vs LCMNX (1000). LCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.70 vs. FSDIX (9.35). LCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 82.42 vs. FSDIX (38.70).
| FSDIX | LCMNX | FSDIX / LCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.98 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.13 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.232 | 4.067 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 172M | 3,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.44 | 3.59 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.35 | 20.70 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.76 | 52.37 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.70 | 82.42 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.60 | 58.69 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers