Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
Price$30.11
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets740.99M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.41
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FSCZX (741M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSCZX: RMEBX (1.10) vs FSCZX (0.33). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.72). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. FSCZX (10.82). RMEBX (42.51) and FSCZX (41.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.806 | 2.045 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 741M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.10 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.82 | 11.75 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.33 | 27.46 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.08 | 42.51 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement