Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
Price$29.88
Change-$0.35 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets698.73M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FSCZX (699M). FSCZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSCZX (1.16) vs RMEBX (1.05). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.72). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. FSCZX (0.18). FSCZX (55.52) and RMEBX (53.80) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.616 | 14.940 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 699M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.05 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | 6.55 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.51 | 30.03 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.52 | 53.80 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers