Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs SSGSX
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$34.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.98M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. FSCWX (285M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCWX (1.54) vs SSGSX (0.47). FSCWX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCWX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSCWX (0.90). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FSCWX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.37 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 100.29 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| FSCWX | SSGSX | FSCWX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.26 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.687 | 2.046 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285M | 5.64B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 0.47 | 325% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.37 | -1.56 | -665% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.00 | 3.97 | 906% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.29 | 22.95 | 437% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers