Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs SSGSX
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$35.30
Change+$0.22 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.58M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.75
Change+$0.70 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. FSCWX (280M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCWX (1.27) vs SSGSX (0.61). FSCWX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCWX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSCWX (0.90). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCWX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. SSGSX (1.49). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 55.74 vs. SSGSX (-3.16).
| FSCWX | SSGSX | FSCWX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.23 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.23 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.216 | 5.281 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280M | 5.04B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.61 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 1.49 | 545% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.21 | -1.36 | -2,366% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.74 | -3.16 | -1,762% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers