Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs SSGSX
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$35.15
Change-$0.30 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.66M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.06
Change-$2.54 (-5.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.29B
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Hold and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.29B vs. FSCWX (279M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCWX (1.56) vs SSGSX (0.48). FSCWX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCWX (9 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSCWX (0.90). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCWX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.95 vs. SSGSX (-8.83). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 69.69 vs. SSGSX (6.40).
| FSCWX | SSGSX | FSCWX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.23 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.23 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.882 | 4.674 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 5.29B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.48 | 327% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.95 | -8.83 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.24 | -1.03 | -3,313% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.69 | 6.40 | 1,088% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers