Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs SSGSX
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$33.22
Change+$0.24 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets280.62M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. FSCWX (281M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCWX (1.65) vs SSGSX (0.51). FSCWX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCWX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSCWX (0.90). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FSCWX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.95 vs. SSGSX (-1.26). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 109.23 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| FSCWX | SSGSX | FSCWX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.26 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.096 | -2.068 | -53% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 5.82B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.51 | 326% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.95 | -1.26 | -948% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.49 | 2.38 | 1,365% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.23 | 29.33 | 372% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement