Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCVX vs SSGSX
FSCVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCVX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value C
Price$27.06
Change+$0.26 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.21M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.75
Change+$0.49 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51B
FSCVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. FSCVX (279M). FSCVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCVX (0.56) vs SSGSX (0.47). FSCVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCVX (27 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). FSCVX (2.06) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FSCVX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCVX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCVX (3000). FSCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.06 vs. SSGSX (-4.89). FSCVX return over 5 years is better than : 103.20 vs. SSGSX (31.67).
| FSCVX | SSGSX | FSCVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.26 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.164 | 0.689 | 459% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 5.52B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.47 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | -4.89 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.40 | 9.83 | 421% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.20 | 31.67 | 326% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.55 | 27.73 | 258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers