Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCVX vs SSGSX
FSCVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCVX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value C
Price$26.21
Change-$0.27 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.02M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
FSCVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. FSCVX (276M). FSCVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCVX (0.60) vs SSGSX (0.50). FSCVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCVX (27 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). FSCVX (2.06) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FSCVX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCVX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCVX (3000). FSCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. SSGSX (-5.53). FSCVX return over 5 years is better than : 77.25 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| FSCVX | SSGSX | FSCVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.26 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.076 | -2.025 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 276M | 5.5B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.50 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | -5.53 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.30 | -9.76 | -136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.25 | 15.88 | 487% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.33 | 15.23 | 350% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement