Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCTX vs NAESX
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCTX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap M
Price$25.66
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.59
Change+$0.15 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCTX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCTX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FSCTX (2.01B). FSCTX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCTX (1.51) vs NAESX (1.20). FSCTX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCTX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCTX (1.53) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCTX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.53 vs. FSCTX (-1.85). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.06 vs. FSCTX (26.41).
| FSCTX | NAESX | FSCTX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.771 | 6.625 | 132% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 161B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.20 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.85 | 15.53 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.89 | 32.39 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.41 | 68.06 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.63 | 133.63 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement