Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCTX vs NAESX
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCTX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap M
Price$24.55
Change+$0.24 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCTX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCTX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. FSCTX (1.93B). FSCTX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCTX (1.59) vs NAESX (1.28). FSCTX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCTX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCTX (1.53) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCTX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. FSCTX (-9.50). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. FSCTX (25.21).
| FSCTX | NAESX | FSCTX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.025 | 2.781 | 145% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 153B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.28 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.50 | 8.46 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.19 | 34.15 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.21 | 66.66 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.48 | 114.71 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement