Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCPX vs RYRAX
FSCPX vs RYRAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYRAX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discret Port
Price$69.24
Change+$0.76 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
Rydex Retailing H
Price$53.92
Change+$0.26 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.18M
FSCPX vs RYRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYRAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a StrongBuy and RYRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. RYRAX (7.18M). FSCPX pays higher dividends than RYRAX: FSCPX (0.06) vs RYRAX (0.00). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYRAX: FSCPX (35 years) vs RYRAX (28 years). RYRAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.70). RYRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 296.00 vs. FSCPX (30.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYRAX: FSCPX (0) vs RYRAX (2500). RYRAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYRAX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). RYRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.05 vs. FSCPX (-4.74). RYRAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.08 vs. FSCPX (6.90).
| FSCPX | RYRAX | FSCPX / RYRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.64 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.69 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.705 | 10.432 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 7.18M | 14,160% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.74 | 7.05 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.99 | 38.08 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.90 | 15.08 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.53 | 115.60 | 78% |