Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCPX vs RYLAX
FSCPX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYLAX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discret Port
Price$70.43
Change-$0.17 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Rydex Leisure H
Price$85.80
Change+$0.82 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.54M
FSCPX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYLAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a StrongBuy and RYLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. RYLAX (5.54M). RYLAX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: RYLAX (0.07) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FSCPX (36 years) vs RYLAX (28 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.70). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FSCPX (30.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FSCPX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYLAX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.24 vs. FSCPX (1.53). FSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 1.57 vs. RYLAX (-1.08).
| FSCPX | RYLAX | FSCPX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.63 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.68 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.459 | -2.456 | -100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 5.54M | 18,170% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.07 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | 3.24 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.22 | 30.17 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.57 | -1.08 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.72 | 77.94 | 170% |