Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCNX vs RLBAX
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% C
Price$17.12
Change-$0.08 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.24B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.99
Change-$0.59 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FSCNX (5.24B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBAX (1.22) vs FSCNX (0.95). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSCNX (18 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. RLBAX (10.45). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.35 vs. FSCNX (20.48).
| FSCNX | RLBAX | FSCNX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.31 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.31 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.927 | 2.371 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.24B | 270B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.22 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 10.45 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.73 | 33.63 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.48 | 31.35 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.61 | 79.34 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers