Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCNX vs RLBAX
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% C
Price$17.45
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.85B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$39.35
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBAX commentary
Dec 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a Buy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FSCNX (4.85B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBAX (1.07) vs FSCNX (0.85). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSCNX (18 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). FSCNX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSCNX (17.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.17 vs. RLBAX (8.27). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.32 vs. FSCNX (25.28).
| FSCNX | RLBAX | FSCNX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.661 | 16.101 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.85B | 269B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.17 | 8.27 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 39.48 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.28 | 34.32 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.38 | 67.81 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers