Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCIX vs NAESX
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCIX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap I
Price$37.88
Change+$0.16 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$130.85
Change+$0.30 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.31B
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCIX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FSCIX (2.02B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSCIX: NAESX (1.22) vs FSCIX (0.03). FSCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). FSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.03 vs. NAESX (12.98). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 34.90 vs. FSCIX (18.78).
| FSCIX | NAESX | FSCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.275 | 5.883 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.03 | 12.98 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.72 | 40.70 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.78 | 34.90 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.09 | 185.16 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement