Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCIX vs NAESX
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCIX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap I
Price$35.50
Change+$0.54 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.98
Change+$1.67 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCIX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FSCIX (2.02B). FSCIX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCIX (1.40) vs NAESX (1.23). FSCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.92 vs. FSCIX (-8.22). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 55.28 vs. FSCIX (30.02).
| FSCIX | NAESX | FSCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.702 | 5.577 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.23 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.22 | 4.92 | -167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.18 | 41.91 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.02 | 55.28 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.93 | 130.16 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement