Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCIX vs NAESX
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCIX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap I
Price$33.98
Change-$0.25 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. FSCIX (1.94B). FSCIX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCIX (1.47) vs NAESX (1.25). FSCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. FSCIX (-4.28). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.53 vs. FSCIX (30.93).
| FSCIX | NAESX | FSCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.683 | 2.494 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 154B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.25 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.28 | 9.15 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.69 | 20.39 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.93 | 57.53 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.48 | 112.59 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement