Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCIX vs NAESX
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCIX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap I
Price$36.95
Change+$0.58 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$124.04
Change+$1.27 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCIX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FSCIX (2.06B). FSCIX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCIX (1.34) vs NAESX (1.21). FSCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.86 vs. FSCIX (-6.70). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. FSCIX (24.31).
| FSCIX | NAESX | FSCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.292 | 7.092 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.21 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.70 | -0.86 | 778% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.86 | 32.07 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.31 | 40.97 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.87 | 131.34 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement