Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCIX vs NAESX
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCIX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap I
Price$31.43
Change-$0.51 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.00
Change-$1.80 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCIX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. FSCIX (1.83B). FSCIX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCIX (1.58) vs NAESX (1.35). FSCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. FSCIX (-6.63). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. FSCIX (38.89).
| FSCIX | NAESX | FSCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.602 | -4.390 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 148B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.35 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.63 | 5.19 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.11 | 31.28 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.89 | 63.19 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.60 | 92.88 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement