Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$32.33
Change+$0.47 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$130.85
Change+$0.30 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.31B
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FSCDX (2.02B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSCDX: NAESX (1.22) vs FSCDX (0.03). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCDX (0) vs NAESX (3000). FSCDX (13.05) and NAESX (12.98) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 34.90 vs. FSCDX (13.30).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.742 | 5.883 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | 12.98 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.57 | 40.70 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.30 | 34.90 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.91 | 185.16 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement