Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$31.50
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$126.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.34B
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FSCDX (2.06B). FSCDX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCDX (1.39) vs NAESX (1.21). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCDX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. FSCDX (1.41). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 36.35 vs. FSCDX (14.07).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.796 | 9.833 | 150% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.21 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.41 | 8.22 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.07 | 44.83 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.07 | 36.35 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.86 | 143.16 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement