Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$32.07
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$130.44
Change+$0.04 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.31B
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Feb 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FSCDX (2.14B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSCDX: NAESX (1.16) vs FSCDX (0.02). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCDX (0) vs NAESX (3000). FSCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.53 vs. NAESX (9.85). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 30.43 vs. FSCDX (8.60).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.605 | 5.551 | 119% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.53 | 9.85 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.47 | 33.04 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.60 | 30.43 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.66 | 186.07 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers