Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$29.67
Change+$0.34 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.10
Change+$1.17 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FSCDX (2.01B). FSCDX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCDX (1.46) vs NAESX (1.20). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCDX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. FSCDX (-6.90). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.48 vs. FSCDX (36.20).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.127 | 6.199 | 131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 161B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.20 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.90 | 8.00 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.21 | 50.66 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.20 | 71.48 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.04 | 148.14 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement