Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$29.90
Change+$0.12 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.59
Change+$0.15 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FSCDX (2.01B). FSCDX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCDX (1.46) vs NAESX (1.20). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCDX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.53 vs. FSCDX (-1.65). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.06 vs. FSCDX (32.69).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.965 | 6.625 | 135% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 161B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.20 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.65 | 15.53 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.92 | 32.39 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.69 | 68.06 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.12 | 133.63 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement