Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCCX vs SSGSX
FSCCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCCX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value I
Price$32.84
Change-$0.33 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.02M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
FSCCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. FSCCX (276M). FSCCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCCX (1.57) vs SSGSX (0.50). FSCCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCCX (31 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSCCX (1.06). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FSCCX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCCX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCCX (100000). FSCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. SSGSX (-5.53). FSCCX return over 5 years is better than : 86.29 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| FSCCX | SSGSX | FSCCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.26 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.582 | -2.025 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 276M | 5.5B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.50 | 313% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | -5.53 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.78 | -9.76 | -172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.29 | 15.88 | 543% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.47 | 15.23 | 450% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement