Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCCX vs SSGSX
FSCCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCCX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value I
Price$34.14
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.98M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
FSCCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. FSCCX (285M). FSCCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCCX (1.46) vs SSGSX (0.47). FSCCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCCX (31 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSCCX (1.06). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FSCCX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCCX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCCX (100000). FSCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.21 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). FSCCX return over 5 years is better than : 98.71 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| FSCCX | SSGSX | FSCCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.26 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.564 | 2.046 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285M | 5.64B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.47 | 308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.21 | -1.56 | -655% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.30 | 3.97 | 889% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.71 | 22.95 | 430% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.37 | 24.71 | 341% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement