FSBW vs MOFG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBW is a Buy and MOFG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FSBW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMOFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FSBW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MOFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FSBW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FSBW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MOFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FSBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.23% price change this week, while MOFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
FSBW is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
MOFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FSBW | MOFG | FSBW / MOFG | |
| Capitalization | 271M | 369M | 73% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.806 | 24.550 | 121% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.32 | 17.17 | 43% |
| Revenue | 141M | 163M | 87% |
| Total Cash | 18.1M | 71M | 25% |
| Total Debt | 150M | 418M | 36% |
FSBW | MOFG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 7 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FSBW's Valuation (59) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (97). This means that FSBW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.
FSBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (64). This means that FSBW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.
FSBW's SMR Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (29). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.
MOFG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSBW (40). This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.
MOFG's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSBW (30). This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.
| FSBW | MOFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 55% |
FSBW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBW has been closely correlated with FCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBW jumps, then FCBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSBW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSBW | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| FCBC - FSBW | 73% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| MOFG - FSBW | 72% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| THFF - FSBW | 72% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| FMBH - FSBW | 71% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| RBCAA - FSBW | 71% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||
MOFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOFG | 100% | -1.25% | ||
| THFF - MOFG | 84% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| HTBK - MOFG | 84% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| TRST - MOFG | 84% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| FMBH - MOFG | 84% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| NWBI - MOFG | 84% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||