FSBW
Price
$39.31
Change
+$0.87 (+2.26%)
Updated
Aug 11, 02:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
292.86M
72 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$27.30
Change
+$0.13 (+0.48%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
700.24M
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSBW vs MCBS

Header iconFSBW vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts FSBW vs MCBSBanner chart's image
FS Ban
Price$39.31
Change+$0.87 (+2.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization292.86M
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$27.30
Change+$0.13 (+0.48%)
Volume$100
Capitalization700.24M
FSBW vs MCBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSBW vs. MCBS commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBW is a Hold and MCBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FSBW: $38.44 vs. MCBS: $27.17)
Brand notoriety: FSBW and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSBW: 28% vs. MCBS: 0%
Market capitalization -- FSBW: $292.86M vs. MCBS: $700.24M
FSBW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $292.86M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $700.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSBW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSBW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSBW is a better buy in the long-term than MCBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSBW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSBW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the short-term than FSBW.

Price Growth

FSBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.90% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSBW is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($700M) has a higher market cap than FSBW($293M). MCBS has higher P/E ratio than FSBW: MCBS (10.67) vs FSBW (9.26). FSBW YTD gains are higher at: -3.846 vs. MCBS (-12.896). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. FSBW (18.7M). FSBW has less debt than MCBS: FSBW (124M) vs MCBS (433M).
FSBWMCBSFSBW / MCBS
Capitalization293M700M42%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.846-12.89630%
P/E Ratio9.2610.6787%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash18.7M279M7%
Total Debt124M433M29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSBW vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
FSBW
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2235
SMR RATING
1..100
3733
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4774
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSBW's Valuation (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (61) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (35) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as FSBW (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as FSBW (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (74) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSBWMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PKKFF0.030.01
+61.14%
TENET FINTECH GROUP INC.
ABSCF1.26N/A
N/A
AB Science, Paris
CHBAF8.01N/A
N/A
Chiba Bank, Ltd. (The)
DTNOY13.54N/A
N/A
DNO ASA
NNFSF5.77N/A
N/A
NONGFU SPRING CO LTD.

FSBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBW has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBW jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBW
1D Price
Change %
FSBW100%
+0.50%
MCBS - FSBW
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
AROW - FSBW
77%
Closely correlated
+3.47%
CAC - FSBW
77%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
FCBC - FSBW
77%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
PFIS - FSBW
76%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
N/A
CTBI - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
SBSI - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
TCBK - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
IBCP - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
MBWM - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
More