FSBW
Price
$42.20
Change
-$0.23 (-0.54%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
320.57M
45 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$29.49
Change
-$0.45 (-1.50%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
753.11M
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSBW vs MCBS

Header iconFSBW vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts FSBW vs MCBSBanner chart's image
FS Ban
Price$42.20
Change-$0.23 (-0.54%)
Volume$10.99K
Capitalization320.57M
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$29.49
Change-$0.45 (-1.50%)
Volume$35.89K
Capitalization753.11M
FSBW vs MCBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSBW vs. MCBS commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBW is a Hold and MCBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FSBW: $42.20 vs. MCBS: $29.49)
Brand notoriety: FSBW and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSBW: 72% vs. MCBS: 102%
Market capitalization -- FSBW: $320.57M vs. MCBS: $753.11M
FSBW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $320.57M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $753.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSBW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSBW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSBW is a better buy in the long-term than MCBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSBW’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSBW’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the short-term than FSBW.

Price Growth

FSBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.19% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSBW is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($753M) has a higher market cap than FSBW($321M). MCBS has higher P/E ratio than FSBW: MCBS (11.47) vs FSBW (10.17). FSBW YTD gains are higher at: 5.559 vs. MCBS (-5.441). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. FSBW (15.2M). FSBW has less debt than MCBS: FSBW (292M) vs MCBS (433M).
FSBWMCBSFSBW / MCBS
Capitalization321M753M43%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.559-5.441-102%
P/E Ratio10.1711.4789%
RevenueN/A145M-
Total Cash15.2M279M5%
Total Debt292M433M67%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSBW vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
FSBW
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3389
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2335
SMR RATING
1..100
3733
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3775
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSBW's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (63) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (35) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as FSBW (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (51) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBS (75) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSBWMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEGCX22.010.16
+0.73%
Invesco International Small Company C
GINNX63.790.31
+0.49%
Guinness Atkinson™ Global Inntrs Instl
CLVRX35.47N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Value Rspnb Idx R6
HUDIX25.33N/A
N/A
Huber Large Cap Value Inv
GTENX49.17-0.09
-0.18%
Gateway N

FSBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBW has been closely correlated with AROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBW jumps, then AROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBW
1D Price
Change %
FSBW100%
-0.54%
AROW - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
MCBS - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
TCBK - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
FCBC - FSBW
77%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
CAC - FSBW
77%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with SMBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then SMBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
-1.50%
SMBC - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
CTBI - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
SBSI - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
TCBK - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
IBCP - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
More