Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBDX vs RGACX
FSBDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs RGACX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth
Price$22.14
Change-$0.05 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.96B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FSBDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FSBDX (14B). FSBDX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FSBDX (0.60) vs RGACX (0.07). FSBDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FSBDX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.01). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FSBDX (0) vs RGACX (250). FSBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. RGACX (14.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. FSBDX (14.48).
| FSBDX | RGACX | FSBDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.94 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.94 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.593 | 14.044 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14B | 329B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.07 | 824% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.41 | 14.08 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.76 | 41.19 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.48 | 41.95 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.69 | 83.68 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement