Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBDX vs GFACX
FSBDX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs GFACX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth
Price$22.46
Change-$0.56 (-2.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.06B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
FSBDX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. GFACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FSBDX (15.1B). FSBDX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FSBDX (0.42) vs GFACX (0.00). FSBDX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FSBDX (12 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.01). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FSBDX (0) vs GFACX (250). FSBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. GFACX (6.76). FSBDX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. GFACX (30.74).
| FSBDX | GFACX | FSBDX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.36 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.36 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.477 | 18.946 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1B | 340B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.33 | 6.76 | 271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 116.04 | 57.80 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.66 | 30.74 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.47 | 82.09 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement