Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBCX vs RIRAX
FSBCX vs RIRAX Comparison
Open Charts FSBCX vs RIRAX
Federated Hermes Global Allocation C
Price$20.29
Change-$0.17 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets270.57M
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R1
Price$75.35
Change-$0.55 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.85B
FSBCX vs RIRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBCX vs. RIRAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBCX is a Buy and RIRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRAX has more cash in the bank: 114B vs. FSBCX (271M). RIRAX pays higher dividends than FSBCX: RIRAX (2.32) vs FSBCX (1.30). FSBCX was incepted earlier than RIRAX: FSBCX (32 years) vs RIRAX (23 years). FSBCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than RIRAX (1.36). FSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. RIRAX (56.00). RIRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSBCX: RIRAX (250) vs FSBCX (1500). RIRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. FSBCX (8.00). RIRAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.34 vs. FSBCX (13.76).
| FSBCX | RIRAX | FSBCX / RIRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.36 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.36 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.786 | 10.010 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 271M | 114B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 2.32 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | 13.05 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.99 | 29.77 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.76 | 44.34 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.04 | 41.42 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement