FSBC
Price
$30.79
Change
-$0.59 (-1.88%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
657.92M
70 days until earnings call
MLGF
Price
$20.16
Change
-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
189.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSBC vs MLGF

Header iconFSBC vs MLGF Comparison
Open Charts FSBC vs MLGFBanner chart's image
Five Star Ban
Price$30.79
Change-$0.59 (-1.88%)
Volume$23.75K
Capitalization657.92M
Malaga Financial
Price$20.16
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Volume$578
Capitalization189.99M
FSBC vs MLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSBC vs. MLGF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBC is a Hold and MLGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FSBC: $30.79 vs. MLGF: $20.16)
Brand notoriety: FSBC and MLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSBC: 50% vs. MLGF: 24%
Market capitalization -- FSBC: $657.92M vs. MLGF: $189.99M
FSBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $657.92M. MLGF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $189.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSBC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLGF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FSBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLGF is a better buy in the long-term than FSBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSBC is a better buy in the short-term than MLGF.

Price Growth

FSBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.32% price change this week, while MLGF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSBC($658M) has a higher market cap than MLGF($190M). FSBC has higher P/E ratio than MLGF: FSBC (12.62) vs MLGF (8.40). FSBC YTD gains are higher at: 4.450 vs. MLGF (-7.761). FSBC has less debt than MLGF: FSBC (80.5M) vs MLGF (263M).
FSBCMLGFFSBC / MLGF
Capitalization658M190M346%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.450-7.761-57%
P/E Ratio12.628.40150%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash42.5MN/A-
Total Debt80.5M263M31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLGF: Fundamental Ratings
MLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
5
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSBCMLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAPNX13.460.05
+0.37%
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Z
PIUCX23.60N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes International Equity C
BSCAX18.32N/A
N/A
Brandes Small Cap Value A
EXTGX58.18-0.20
-0.34%
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.2 A
VINAX147.96-0.78
-0.52%
Vanguard Industrials Index Admiral

FSBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBC has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBC jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBC
1D Price
Change %
FSBC100%
-1.88%
TCBK - FSBC
86%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
FFBC - FSBC
86%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
GABC - FSBC
86%
Closely correlated
-1.75%
THFF - FSBC
86%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
EFSC - FSBC
85%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
More

MLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLGF and AFNL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLGF and AFNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGF
1D Price
Change %
MLGF100%
-0.10%
AFNL - MLGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSBC - MLGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
RBB - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
TFSL - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
RBKB - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More