FSBC
Price
$30.42
Change
+$0.66 (+2.22%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
390.45M
21 days until earnings call
MLGF
Price
$20.33
Change
+$0.08 (+0.40%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
41.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSBC vs MLGF

Header iconFSBC vs MLGF Comparison
Open Charts FSBC vs MLGFBanner chart's image
Five Star Ban
Price$30.42
Change+$0.66 (+2.22%)
Volume$21.2K
Capitalization390.45M
Malaga Financial
Price$20.33
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
Volume$5.45K
Capitalization41.82M
FSBC vs MLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSBC vs. MLGF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBC is a Buy and MLGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FSBC: $30.42 vs. MLGF: $20.33)
Brand notoriety: FSBC and MLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSBC: 41% vs. MLGF: 258%
Market capitalization -- FSBC: $390.45M vs. MLGF: $41.82M
FSBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $390.45M. MLGF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $41.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MLGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLGF is a better buy in the long-term than FSBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSBC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSBC and MLGF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.61% price change this week, while MLGF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.15% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSBC($390M) has a higher market cap than MLGF($41.8M). FSBC (7.99) and MLGF (7.61) have similar P/E ratio . FSBC YTD gains are higher at: 2.493 vs. MLGF (-6.984). FSBC has less debt than MLGF: FSBC (249M) vs MLGF (263M). FSBC has higher revenues than MLGF: FSBC (117M) vs MLGF (18M).
FSBCMLGFFSBC / MLGF
Capitalization390M41.8M933%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.493-6.984-36%
P/E Ratio7.997.61105%
Revenue117M18M650%
Total Cash27MN/A-
Total Debt249M263M95%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLGF: Fundamental Ratings
MLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
5
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSBCMLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
12%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
15%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KYCCF388.051.05
+0.27%
Keyence Corp.
KMMPF14.21N/A
N/A
Killiam Apt Real Estate Invt Tr
TOPPY14.07N/A
N/A
TOPPAN HOLDINGS INC.
XXMMF0.09N/A
N/A
XIMEN MINING CORP
IESVF0.31-0.01
-3.22%
Invinity Energy Sys Plc.

FSBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBC has been closely correlated with EQBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBC jumps, then EQBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBC
1D Price
Change %
FSBC100%
+2.22%
EQBK - FSBC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
THFF - FSBC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
TCBK - FSBC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
FFIN - FSBC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
UBSI - FSBC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
More

MLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLGF and AFNL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLGF and AFNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGF
1D Price
Change %
MLGF100%
+0.40%
AFNL - MLGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSBC - MLGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
RBB - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
TFSL - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
RBKB - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
More