Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSATX vs RLBAX
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSATX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% M
Price$17.52
Change-$0.20 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.81B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.66
Change-$0.48 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSATX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FSATX (4.81B). FSATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSATX (1.35) vs RLBAX (1.08). FSATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSATX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSATX (1.19). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSATX (17.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. RLBAX (7.89). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. FSATX (32.69).
| FSATX | RLBAX | FSATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.515 | 14.065 | 110% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.81B | 269B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.08 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 7.89 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.33 | 39.62 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.69 | 35.24 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.49 | 66.41 | 109% |