Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSATX vs RLBAX
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSATX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% M
Price$17.20
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.09B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSATX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FSATX (5.09B). FSATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSATX (1.50) vs RLBAX (1.25). FSATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSATX (18 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSATX (1.20). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSATX (17.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.75 vs. RLBAX (13.33). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.37 vs. FSATX (24.46).
| FSATX | RLBAX | FSATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.31 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.31 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.014 | 2.290 | 88% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.09B | 270B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.25 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.75 | 13.33 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.91 | 34.62 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.46 | 32.37 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.93 | 80.23 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers