Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSATX vs RLBAX
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSATX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% M
Price$17.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSATX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. FSATX (4.68B). FSATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSATX (1.37) vs RLBAX (1.10). FSATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSATX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSATX (1.19). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSATX (17.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. RLBAX (7.84). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. FSATX (33.59).
| FSATX | RLBAX | FSATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.429 | 13.947 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 265B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.10 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | 7.84 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.42 | 47.39 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.59 | 37.69 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.22 | 67.66 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement