Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSATX vs RLBAX
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSATX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% M
Price$17.66
Change+$0.05 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.85B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$39.42
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSATX is a Buy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FSATX (4.85B). FSATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSATX (1.35) vs RLBAX (1.07). FSATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSATX (18 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSATX (1.19). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSATX (17.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.29 vs. RLBAX (8.90). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.56 vs. FSATX (28.52).
| FSATX | RLBAX | FSATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.124 | 16.307 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.85B | 269B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.29 | 8.90 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.68 | 37.89 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.52 | 34.56 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.04 | 67.44 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement