Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSATX vs RLBAX
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSATX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% M
Price$17.35
Change-$0.09 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.24B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.99
Change-$0.59 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSATX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FSATX (5.24B). FSATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSATX (1.46) vs RLBAX (1.22). FSATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSATX (18 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSATX (1.20). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSATX (29.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.14 vs. RLBAX (10.45). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.35 vs. FSATX (23.70).
| FSATX | RLBAX | FSATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.31 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.31 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.962 | 2.371 | 125% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.24B | 270B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.22 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.14 | 10.45 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.68 | 33.63 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.70 | 31.35 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.86 | 79.34 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement