Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSATX vs RLBAX
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSATX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% M
Price$17.23
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.55B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.14
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.04B
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSATX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. FSATX (4.55B). FSATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSATX (1.41) vs RLBAX (1.15). FSATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSATX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSATX (1.19). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSATX (17.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. RLBAX (7.27). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.00 vs. FSATX (36.55).
| FSATX | RLBAX | FSATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.995 | 12.531 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 262B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.15 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 7.27 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 48.19 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.55 | 40.00 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.41 | 74.51 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement