Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSANX vs RLBAX
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSANX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Asset Manager 60%
Price$16.22
Change-$0.15 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.3B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSANX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSANX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. FSANX (4.3B). FSANX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSANX (2.02) vs RLBAX (1.23). FSANX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSANX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSANX (0.64). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSANX (17.00). FSANX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSANX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.17 vs. RLBAX (4.45). FSANX return over 5 years is better than : 38.58 vs. RLBAX (34.05).
| FSANX | RLBAX | FSANX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.31 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.31 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.713 | 4.085 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.3B | 244B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.23 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.17 | 4.45 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.01 | 30.02 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.58 | 34.05 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.54 | 51.23 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement