Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSANX vs RLBAX
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSANX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Asset Manager 60%
Price$17.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.45B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSANX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSANX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. FSANX (4.45B). FSANX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSANX (1.93) vs RLBAX (1.17). FSANX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSANX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSANX (0.64). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSANX (17.00). FSANX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSANX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.47 vs. RLBAX (7.15). FSANX return over 5 years is better than : 36.44 vs. RLBAX (33.77).
| FSANX | RLBAX | FSANX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.31 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.31 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.458 | 9.243 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.45B | 256B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.17 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.47 | 7.15 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.51 | 27.06 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.44 | 33.77 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.45 | 59.12 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement