Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSANX vs RLBAX
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSANX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Asset Manager 60%
Price$17.42
Change-$0.08 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.55B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.04
Change-$0.16 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.26B
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSANX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSANX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. FSANX (4.55B). FSANX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSANX (1.89) vs RLBAX (1.15). FSANX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSANX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSANX (0.64). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSANX (17.00). FSANX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSANX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.20 vs. RLBAX (6.99). FSANX (41.10) and RLBAX (39.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSANX | RLBAX | FSANX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.31 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.31 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.976 | 12.236 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 263B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.15 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.20 | 6.99 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.31 | 47.80 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.10 | 39.63 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.12 | 74.05 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers