Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSANX vs RLBAX
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSANX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Asset Manager 60%
Price$16.93
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSANX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSANX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. FSANX (4.44B). FSANX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSANX (1.94) vs RLBAX (1.18). FSANX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSANX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSANX (0.64). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSANX (17.00). FSANX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSANX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. RLBAX (9.42). FSANX return over 5 years is better than : 38.14 vs. RLBAX (35.28).
| FSANX | RLBAX | FSANX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.31 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.31 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.296 | 8.565 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 254B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.18 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.71 | 9.42 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.06 | 32.14 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.14 | 35.28 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.08 | 58.06 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers