Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs UPMMX
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UPMMX
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Cl A
Price$43.18
Change-$0.73 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UPMMX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a StrongBuy and UPMMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 3.41B vs. UPMMX (1.07B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UPMMX: FSAGX (1.71) vs UPMMX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UPMMX: FSAGX (40 years) vs UPMMX (15 years). UPMMX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. UPMMX (1.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UPMMX: FSAGX (0) vs UPMMX (2500). UPMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 125.06 vs. FSAGX (110.49). UPMMX return over 5 years is better than : 114.09 vs. FSAGX (85.74).
| FSAGX | UPMMX | FSAGX / UPMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.34 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.40 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 116.111 | 136.584 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.41B | 1.07B | 318% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 110.49 | 125.06 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 156.70 | 190.74 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.74 | 114.09 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 346.73 | 446.03 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement