Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs UPMMX
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UPMMX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$47.45
Change+$1.15 (+2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.85B
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Cl A
Price$36.44
Change+$0.97 (+2.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.63M
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UPMMX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Buy and UPMMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.85B vs. UPMMX (928M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UPMMX: FSAGX (1.88) vs UPMMX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UPMMX: FSAGX (40 years) vs UPMMX (15 years). UPMMX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. UPMMX (1.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UPMMX: FSAGX (0) vs UPMMX (2500). FSAGX (83.18) and UPMMX (81.66) have marching annual gain over last year. UPMMX return over 5 years is better than : 64.55 vs. FSAGX (56.11).
| FSAGX | UPMMX | FSAGX / UPMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.34 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.40 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 93.043 | 96.336 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 928M | 307% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 83.18 | 81.66 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 169.68 | 186.52 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.11 | 64.55 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 295.18 | 343.37 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement