Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs UIPMX
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UIPMX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$47.45
Change+$1.15 (+2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.85B
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Instl
Price$36.90
Change-$0.52 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.63M
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UIPMX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Buy and UIPMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.85B vs. UIPMX (928M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FSAGX (1.88) vs UIPMX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FSAGX (40 years) vs UIPMX (17 years). UIPMX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. UIPMX (1.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FSAGX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). FSAGX (83.18) and UIPMX (82.26) have marching annual gain over last year. UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 67.33 vs. FSAGX (56.11).
| FSAGX | UIPMX | FSAGX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.01 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.10 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 93.043 | 96.731 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 928M | 307% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 83.18 | 82.26 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 169.68 | 189.40 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.11 | 67.33 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 295.18 | 359.87 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement