Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAEX vs RWMFX
FSAEX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSAEX vs RWMFX
Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity
Price$13.95
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.49B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
FSAEX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAEX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAEX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. FSAEX (4.49B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FSAEX: RWMFX (1.43) vs FSAEX (1.02). FSAEX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FSAEX (17 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FSAEX (0.00). FSAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). FSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FSAEX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.78 vs. RWMFX (7.95). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. FSAEX (37.86).
| FSAEX | RWMFX | FSAEX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.486 | 8.213 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.49B | 205B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.43 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.78 | 7.95 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.20 | 34.82 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.86 | 50.81 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.64 | 83.34 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers