Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAAX vs RLBAX
FSAAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSAAX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% A
Price$16.12
Change-$0.15 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.3B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
FSAAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. FSAAX (4.3B). FSAAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSAAX (1.74) vs RLBAX (1.23). FSAAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSAAX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSAAX (0.94). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSAAX (17.00). FSAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSAAX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.90 vs. RLBAX (4.45). FSAAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.43 vs. RLBAX (34.05).
| FSAAX | RLBAX | FSAAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.31 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.31 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.607 | 4.085 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.3B | 244B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.23 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | 4.45 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.85 | 30.02 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.43 | 34.05 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.64 | 51.23 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement