Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAAX vs RLBAX
FSAAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSAAX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% A
Price$17.12
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.55B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
FSAAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. FSAAX (4.55B). FSAAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSAAX (1.63) vs RLBAX (1.15). FSAAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSAAX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSAAX (0.94). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSAAX (17.00). FSAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSAAX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. RLBAX (9.12). RLBAX (35.40) and FSAAX (34.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSAAX | RLBAX | FSAAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.31 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.31 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.097 | 10.805 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 259B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.15 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 9.12 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.00 | 37.15 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.31 | 35.40 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.89 | 67.71 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement