Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAAX vs RLBAX
FSAAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSAAX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% A
Price$16.64
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.52
Change+$0.17 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
FSAAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. FSAAX (4.44B). FSAAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSAAX (1.68) vs RLBAX (1.18). FSAAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSAAX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSAAX (0.94). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSAAX (17.00). FSAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSAAX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.21 vs. RLBAX (7.00). FSAAX (37.58) and RLBAX (37.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSAAX | RLBAX | FSAAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.31 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.31 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.982 | 7.651 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 252B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 7.00 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.54 | 32.45 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.58 | 37.04 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.42 | 58.01 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers