FRZCF
Price
$1.75
Change
+$0.08 (+4.79%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
WRDEF
Price
$16.00
Change
+$1.00 (+6.67%)
Updated
Feb 24 closing price
Capitalization
717.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRZCF vs WRDEF

Header iconFRZCF vs WRDEF Comparison
Open Charts FRZCF vs WRDEFBanner chart's image
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
Price$1.75
Change+$0.08 (+4.79%)
Volume$590
Capitalization2.77B
Wereldhave
Price$16.00
Change+$1.00 (+6.67%)
Volume$511
Capitalization717.51M
FRZCF vs WRDEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRZCF vs. WRDEF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRZCF is a Hold and WRDEF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FRZCF: $1.75 vs. WRDEF: $16.00)
Brand notoriety: FRZCF and WRDEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRZCF: 53% vs. WRDEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FRZCF: $2.77B vs. WRDEF: $717.51M
FRZCF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.77B. WRDEF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $717.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRZCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRDEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRZCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WRDEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WRDEF is a better buy in the long-term than FRZCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRZCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FRZCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

FRZCF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WRDEF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.52% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRZCF($2.77B) has a higher market cap than WRDEF($718M). FRZCF YTD gains are higher at: 12.141 vs. WRDEF (6.667). FRZCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 275M vs. WRDEF (117M). FRZCF has more cash in the bank: 24.6M vs. WRDEF (19.5M). WRDEF has less debt than FRZCF: WRDEF (919M) vs FRZCF (2.2B). FRZCF has higher revenues than WRDEF: FRZCF (368M) vs WRDEF (172M).
FRZCFWRDEFFRZCF / WRDEF
Capitalization2.77B718M386%
EBITDA275M117M235%
Gain YTD12.1416.667182%
P/E Ratio18.45N/A-
Revenue368M172M214%
Total Cash24.6M19.5M126%
Total Debt2.2B919M239%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRZCF vs WRDEF: Fundamental Ratings
FRZCF
WRDEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6928
SMR RATING
1..100
9386
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6171
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WRDEF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRZCF (79). This means that WRDEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRZCF’s over the last 12 months.

WRDEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRZCF (69). This means that WRDEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRZCF’s over the last 12 months.

WRDEF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as FRZCF (93). This means that WRDEF’s stock grew similarly to FRZCF’s over the last 12 months.

WRDEF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FRZCF (55). This means that WRDEF’s stock grew similarly to FRZCF’s over the last 12 months.

FRZCF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as WRDEF (71). This means that FRZCF’s stock grew similarly to WRDEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRZCFWRDEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ECFGX23.990.27
+1.14%
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C
BDSIX18.670.19
+1.03%
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Instl
FCNKX23.400.23
+0.99%
Fidelity Contrafund K
WFTDX13.410.13
+0.98%
Allspring Innovation Fund - Class Admin
JDSNX22.550.14
+0.62%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value N

FRZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRZCF has been loosely correlated with STKAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRZCF jumps, then STKAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRZCF
1D Price
Change %
FRZCF100%
N/A
STKAF - FRZCF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NRWRF - FRZCF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRKWF - FRZCF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GECFF - FRZCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTSGF - FRZCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WRDEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WRDEF and ACR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WRDEF and ACR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRDEF
1D Price
Change %
WRDEF100%
N/A
ACR - WRDEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
MNARF - WRDEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NLCP - WRDEF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
UNBLF - WRDEF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRZCF - WRDEF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More