FRZCF
Price
$1.75
Change
+$0.08 (+4.79%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
SEGXF
Price
$9.22
Change
-$0.15 (-1.60%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
12.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRZCF vs SEGXF

Header iconFRZCF vs SEGXF Comparison
Open Charts FRZCF vs SEGXFBanner chart's image
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
Price$1.75
Change+$0.08 (+4.79%)
Volume$590
Capitalization2.77B
Segro Plc REIT
Price$9.22
Change-$0.15 (-1.60%)
Volume$700
Capitalization12.01B
FRZCF vs SEGXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEGXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRZCF vs. SEGXF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRZCF is a Hold and SEGXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FRZCF: $1.75 vs. SEGXF: $9.22)
Brand notoriety: FRZCF and SEGXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRZCF: 53% vs. SEGXF: 54%
Market capitalization -- FRZCF: $2.77B vs. SEGXF: $12.01B
FRZCF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.77B. SEGXF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $12.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRZCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSEGXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRZCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SEGXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRZCF and SEGXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRZCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEGXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRZCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SEGXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRZCF is a better buy in the short-term than SEGXF.

Price Growth

FRZCF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SEGXF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.40% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEGXF($12B) has a higher market cap than FRZCF($2.77B). FRZCF has higher P/E ratio than SEGXF: FRZCF (18.45) vs SEGXF (2.47). FRZCF YTD gains are higher at: 12.141 vs. SEGXF (9.762). FRZCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 275M vs. SEGXF (-3.26B). SEGXF has more cash in the bank: 44M vs. FRZCF (24.6M). FRZCF has less debt than SEGXF: FRZCF (2.2B) vs SEGXF (5.23B). SEGXF has higher revenues than FRZCF: SEGXF (681M) vs FRZCF (368M).
FRZCFSEGXFFRZCF / SEGXF
Capitalization2.77B12B23%
EBITDA275M-3.26B-8%
Gain YTD12.1419.762124%
P/E Ratio18.452.47746%
Revenue368M681M54%
Total Cash24.6M44M56%
Total Debt2.2B5.23B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRZCF vs SEGXF: Fundamental Ratings
FRZCF
SEGXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6162
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRZCF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SEGXF (82). This means that FRZCF’s stock grew similarly to SEGXF’s over the last 12 months.

FRZCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SEGXF (100). This means that FRZCF’s stock grew similarly to SEGXF’s over the last 12 months.

FRZCF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SEGXF (93). This means that FRZCF’s stock grew similarly to SEGXF’s over the last 12 months.

FRZCF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SEGXF (59). This means that FRZCF’s stock grew similarly to SEGXF’s over the last 12 months.

FRZCF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SEGXF (62). This means that FRZCF’s stock grew similarly to SEGXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRZCFSEGXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEGXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBX28.000.45
+1.63%
Dropbox
HURN139.611.22
+0.88%
Huron Consulting Group
AGNCM24.640.07
+0.29%
AGNC Investment Corp
SRTS4.66-0.04
-0.85%
Sensus Healthcare
REI0.79-0.02
-2.44%
Ring Energy

FRZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRZCF has been loosely correlated with STKAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRZCF jumps, then STKAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRZCF
1D Price
Change %
FRZCF100%
N/A
STKAF - FRZCF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NRWRF - FRZCF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRKWF - FRZCF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GECFF - FRZCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTSGF - FRZCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SEGXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEGXF and STKAF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEGXF and STKAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEGXF
1D Price
Change %
SEGXF100%
N/A
STKAF - SEGXF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INGEF - SEGXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTLCY - SEGXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
PK - SEGXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
FRZCF - SEGXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More