FRZCF
Price
$1.82
Change
+$0.06 (+3.41%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.69B
PRKWF
Price
$3.25
Change
-$0.12 (-3.56%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRZCF vs PRKWF

Header iconFRZCF vs PRKWF Comparison
Open Charts FRZCF vs PRKWFBanner chart's image
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
Price$1.82
Change+$0.06 (+3.41%)
Volume$3.58K
Capitalization3.69B
Parkway Life REIT
Price$3.25
Change-$0.12 (-3.56%)
Volume$2.85K
Capitalization2.07B
FRZCF vs PRKWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRKWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRZCF vs. PRKWF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRZCF is a Hold and PRKWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FRZCF: $1.82 vs. PRKWF: $3.25)
Brand notoriety: FRZCF and PRKWF are both not notable
FRZCF represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while PRKWF is part of the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRZCF: 113% vs. PRKWF: 392%
Market capitalization -- FRZCF: $3.69B vs. PRKWF: $2.07B
FRZCF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.69B. PRKWF’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $2.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.33B. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRZCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRKWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRZCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRKWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRKWF is a better buy in the long-term than FRZCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRZCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRKWF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRZCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PRKWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRZCF and PRKWF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRZCF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +3.41% price change this week, while PRKWF (@Managed Health Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.63%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.91% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Managed Health Care (-0.35% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRZCF($3.69B) has a higher market cap than PRKWF($2.07B). PRKWF has higher P/E ratio than FRZCF: PRKWF (31.82) vs FRZCF (20.53). PRKWF YTD gains are higher at: 27.451 vs. FRZCF (16.294). FRZCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 289M vs. PRKWF (106M). PRKWF has more cash in the bank: 49M vs. FRZCF (32.6M). PRKWF has less debt than FRZCF: PRKWF (927M) vs FRZCF (2.03B). FRZCF has higher revenues than PRKWF: FRZCF (364M) vs PRKWF (151M).
FRZCFPRKWFFRZCF / PRKWF
Capitalization3.69B2.07B178%
EBITDA289M106M273%
Gain YTD16.29427.45159%
P/E Ratio20.5331.8265%
Revenue364M151M241%
Total Cash32.6M49M67%
Total Debt2.03B927M219%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRZCF vs PRKWF: Fundamental Ratings
FRZCF
PRKWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4891
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6966
SMR RATING
1..100
9387
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7620
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRKWF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRZCF (88). This means that PRKWF’s stock grew significantly faster than FRZCF’s over the last 12 months.

PRKWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as FRZCF (69). This means that PRKWF’s stock grew similarly to FRZCF’s over the last 12 months.

PRKWF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as FRZCF (93). This means that PRKWF’s stock grew similarly to FRZCF’s over the last 12 months.

FRZCF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as PRKWF (58). This means that FRZCF’s stock grew similarly to PRKWF’s over the last 12 months.

PRKWF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRZCF (76). This means that PRKWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRZCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRZCFPRKWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRKWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FVFRX57.750.70
+1.23%
Franklin Small Cap Value R
DPREX13.320.11
+0.83%
Macquarie Global Listed Real Assets A
NNLEX24.720.17
+0.69%
Nicholas Limited Edition N
RLLGX77.690.29
+0.37%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R6
SCGVX32.71-0.03
-0.09%
Sands Capital Global Growth Inv

FRZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRZCF has been loosely correlated with NRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRZCF jumps, then NRWRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRZCF
1D Price
Change %
FRZCF100%
N/A
NRWRF - FRZCF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRKWF - FRZCF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTSGF - FRZCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPAMF - FRZCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDV - FRZCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More

PRKWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRKWF has been loosely correlated with NTSGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRKWF jumps, then NTSGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRKWF
1D Price
Change %
PRKWF100%
N/A
NTSGF - PRKWF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FRZCF - PRKWF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRWRF - PRKWF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPAMF - PRKWF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - PRKWF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More