FRZCF
Price
$1.72
Change
-$0.01 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
NTSGF
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
6.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRZCF vs NTSGF

Header iconFRZCF vs NTSGF Comparison
Open Charts FRZCF vs NTSGFBanner chart's image
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
Price$1.72
Change-$0.01 (-0.58%)
Volume$2.57K
Capitalization2.77B
NATIONAL STORAGE REIT
Price$1.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.13K
Capitalization6.14B
FRZCF vs NTSGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRZCF vs. NTSGF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRZCF is a Hold and NTSGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FRZCF: $1.72 vs. NTSGF: $1.60)
Brand notoriety: FRZCF and NTSGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRZCF: 280% vs. NTSGF: 127%
Market capitalization -- FRZCF: $2.77B vs. NTSGF: $6.14B
FRZCF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.77B. NTSGF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $6.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRZCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTSGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRZCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NTSGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTSGF is a better buy in the long-term than FRZCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRZCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTSGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRZCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NTSGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTSGF is a better buy in the short-term than FRZCF.

Price Growth

FRZCF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.58% price change this week, while NTSGF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.93% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTSGF($6.14B) has a higher market cap than FRZCF($2.77B). FRZCF has higher P/E ratio than NTSGF: FRZCF (18.45) vs NTSGF (3.43). NTSGF YTD gains are higher at: 10.345 vs. FRZCF (9.585). NTSGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 579M vs. FRZCF (275M). NTSGF has more cash in the bank: 83.7M vs. FRZCF (24.6M). NTSGF has less debt than FRZCF: NTSGF (1.08B) vs FRZCF (2.2B). FRZCF has higher revenues than NTSGF: FRZCF (368M) vs NTSGF (299M).
FRZCFNTSGFFRZCF / NTSGF
Capitalization2.77B6.14B45%
EBITDA275M579M47%
Gain YTD9.58510.34593%
P/E Ratio18.453.43537%
Revenue368M299M123%
Total Cash24.6M83.7M29%
Total Debt2.2B1.08B203%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRZCF: Fundamental Ratings
FRZCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRZCFNTSGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFLV32.010.14
+0.44%
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
PTBD19.740.02
+0.13%
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
MUSQ29.11N/A
N/A
MUSQ Global Music Industry Idx ETF
SMLL21.99N/A
N/A
Harbor Active Small Cap ETF
OSEA29.66-0.05
-0.15%
Harbor International Compounders ETF

FRZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRZCF has been loosely correlated with STKAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRZCF jumps, then STKAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRZCF
1D Price
Change %
FRZCF100%
-0.58%
STKAF - FRZCF
46%
Loosely correlated
-4.51%
NRWRF - FRZCF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRKWF - FRZCF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GECFF - FRZCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTSGF - FRZCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NTSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTSGF has been loosely correlated with PRKWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTSGF jumps, then PRKWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTSGF
1D Price
Change %
NTSGF100%
N/A
PRKWF - NTSGF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FRZCF - NTSGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
NRWRF - NTSGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - NTSGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPTGF - NTSGF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More