Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRVFX vs SSGSX
FRVFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FRVFX vs SSGSX
Franklin Small Cap Value C
Price$46.55
Change-$0.53 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.83B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
FRVFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRVFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRVFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. FRVFX (3.83B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than FRVFX: SSGSX (0.50) vs FRVFX (0.29). FRVFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FRVFX (29 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). FRVFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). FRVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.68 vs. SSGSX (37.00). FRVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FRVFX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). FRVFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.68 vs. SSGSX (-5.53). FRVFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.35 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| FRVFX | SSGSX | FRVFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.26 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.26 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.905 | -2.025 | -94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.83B | 5.5B | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.50 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.68 | -5.53 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.61 | -9.76 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.35 | 15.88 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.92 | 15.23 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers