Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRUSX vs MMUBX
FRUSX vs MMUBX Comparison
Open Charts FRUSX vs MMUBX
FRUSX vs MMUBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRUSX vs. MMUBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRUSX is a Hold and MMUBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRUSX has more cash in the bank: 7.26B vs. MMUBX (2.6B). FRUSX pays higher dividends than MMUBX: FRUSX (1.72) vs MMUBX (1.11). FRUSX was incepted earlier than MMUBX: FRUSX (31 years) vs MMUBX (32 years). MMUBX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FRUSX (1.21). MMUBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. FRUSX (6.80). FRUSX (1000) and MMUBX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MMUBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.54 vs. FRUSX (9.88). FRUSX return over 5 years is better than : 35.49 vs. MMUBX (15.47).
| FRUSX | MMUBX | FRUSX / MMUBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.75 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.76 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.700 | 2.150 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.26B | 2.6B | 279% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.11 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.88 | 13.54 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.68 | 17.96 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.49 | 15.47 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.49 | 70.84 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement