Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRUSX vs FUGCX
FRUSX vs FUGCX Comparison
Open Charts FRUSX vs FUGCX
Fidelity Advisor Utilities C
Price$45.61
Change-$0.18 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
FRUSX vs FUGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRUSX vs. FUGCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRUSX is a Hold and FUGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRUSX has more cash in the bank: 6.9B vs. FUGCX (1.36B). FRUSX pays higher dividends than FUGCX: FRUSX (1.78) vs FUGCX (0.86). FRUSX was incepted earlier than FUGCX: FRUSX (30 years) vs FUGCX (28 years). FUGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FRUSX (1.21). FUGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. FRUSX (6.80). FUGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRUSX: FUGCX (0) vs FRUSX (1000). FUGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.36 vs. FRUSX (6.22). FUGCX return over 5 years is better than : 66.65 vs. FRUSX (33.33).
| FRUSX | FUGCX | FRUSX / FUGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.74 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.74 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.409 | 7.569 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.9B | 1.36B | 507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 0.86 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.22 | 8.36 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.06 | 19.55 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.33 | 66.65 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.90 | 107.11 | 69% |