Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRTY vs IMCG
FRTY vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts FRTY vs IMCG
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
Price$19.05
Change+$0.21 (+1.11%)
Volume$36.04K
Net Assets99.76M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$81.29
Change+$0.83 (+1.03%)
Volume$51.64K
Net Assets2.84B
FRTY vs IMCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRTY vs. IMCG commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRTY is a Hold and IMCG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.84B vs. FRTY (99.8M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than FRTY: IMCG (7.995) vs FRTY (1.854). FRTY was incepted earlier than IMCG: FRTY (4 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FRTY (0.60). FRTY has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| FRTY | IMCG | FRTY / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | 1.854 | 7.995 | 23% |
| Net Assets | 99.8M | 2.84B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.06 | 1,000% |
| Turnover | 199.13 | 43.00 | 463% |
| Yield | 0.10 | 0.75 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FRTY | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FRTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRTY has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRTY jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRTY | 100% | +1.10% | ||
| FIX - FRTY | 74% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| ARES - FRTY | 74% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| TLN - FRTY | 67% Closely correlated | +3.63% | ||
| APP - FRTY | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| CAVA - FRTY | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.61% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||