FRTAY
Price
$16.68
Change
+$1.68 (+11.20%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.29B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IHS
Price
$8.64
Change
+$1.93 (+28.76%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.9B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRTAY vs IHS

Header iconFRTAY vs IHS Comparison
Open Charts FRTAY vs IHSBanner chart's image
Freenet AG
Price$16.68
Change+$1.68 (+11.20%)
Volume$1.71K
Capitalization4.29B
IHS Holding
Price$8.64
Change+$1.93 (+28.76%)
Volume$1.68M
Capitalization2.9B
FRTAY vs IHS Comparison Chart in %
FRTAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IHS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRTAY vs. IHS commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRTAY is a Buy and IHS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FRTAY: $18.02 vs. IHS: $8.64)
Brand notoriety: FRTAY and IHS are both not notable
FRTAY represents the Major Telecommunications, while IHS is part of the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRTAY: 19% vs. IHS: 146%
Market capitalization -- FRTAY: $4.29B vs. IHS: $2.9B
FRTAY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $4.29B. IHS’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $221.11B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.83B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRTAY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIHS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRTAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IHS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRTAY is a better buy in the long-term than IHS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRTAY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IHS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRTAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IHS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRTAY is a better buy in the short-term than IHS.

Price Growth

FRTAY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +9.81% price change this week, while IHS (@Real Estate Development) price change was +9.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.73%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

IHS is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.17% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

@Real Estate Development (-1.75% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRTAY($4.29B) has a higher market cap than IHS($2.9B). FRTAY has higher P/E ratio than IHS: FRTAY (13.82) vs IHS (6.26). IHS YTD gains are higher at: 15.818 vs. FRTAY (0.530). IHS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 995M vs. FRTAY (544M). IHS has more cash in the bank: 648M vs. FRTAY (205M). FRTAY has less debt than IHS: FRTAY (250M) vs IHS (3.9B). FRTAY has higher revenues than IHS: FRTAY (2.48B) vs IHS (1.77B).
FRTAYIHSFRTAY / IHS
Capitalization4.29B2.9B148%
EBITDA544M995M55%
Gain YTD0.53015.8183%
P/E Ratio13.826.26221%
Revenue2.48B1.77B141%
Total Cash205M648M32%
Total Debt250M3.9B6%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTAYIHS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRTAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IHS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSINX23.540.22
+0.94%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Inv
JDSRX24.380.19
+0.79%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value R
VGSAX37.020.16
+0.43%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Glb Rl Estt Secs A
AZBIX26.03-0.03
-0.12%
Virtus Small-Cap Institutional
SCRLX82.42-1.12
-1.34%
Touchstone Large Cap Focused Instl

FRTAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRTAY and TELDF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRTAY and TELDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRTAY
1D Price
Change %
FRTAY100%
N/A
TELDF - FRTAY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IIJIF - FRTAY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - FRTAY
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
KORE - FRTAY
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
IHS - FRTAY
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
More

IHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHS has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IHS jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHS
1D Price
Change %
IHS100%
-1.03%
S - IHS
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LILA - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
TDS - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
LBRDK - IHS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
LILAK - IHS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More