It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRTAY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHTWSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRTAY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HTWSF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
FRTAY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HTWSF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.59%.
Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
FRTAY | HTWSF | FRTAY / HTWSF | |
Capitalization | 3.88B | 1.93B | 201% |
EBITDA | 523M | 487M | 107% |
Gain YTD | 23.738 | 70.093 | 34% |
P/E Ratio | 13.31 | 23.95 | 56% |
Revenue | 2.49B | 820M | 304% |
Total Cash | 136M | 184M | 74% |
Total Debt | 251M | 1.95B | 13% |
FRTAY | HTWSF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago29% | 4 days ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago43% | 4 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago47% | 4 days ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago41% | 4 days ago42% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago16% | 4 days ago48% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago65% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NEFFX | 71.54 | 0.53 | +0.75% |
American Funds New Economy F2 | |||
BSMAX | 18.19 | 0.11 | +0.61% |
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Idx Inv A | |||
LMVOX | 29.95 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F3 | |||
FMDGX | 36.57 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index | |||
CNRWX | 26.33 | -0.08 | -0.30% |
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq N |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FRTAY and KORE have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRTAY and KORE's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRTAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FRTAY | 100% | N/A | ||
KORE - FRTAY | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.81% | ||
HTWSF - FRTAY | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
CUCSF - FRTAY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LLEIF - FRTAY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LMGHF - FRTAY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and CLCMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and CLCMF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTWSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HTWSF | 100% | +2.82% | ||
CLCMF - HTWSF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SFTBY - HTWSF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
MTNOY - HTWSF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
LLEIF - HTWSF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FYBR - HTWSF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
More |