FRT
Price
$93.85
Change
+$0.12 (+0.13%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
8.09B
75 days until earnings call
SKT
Price
$32.34
Change
-$0.13 (-0.40%)
Updated
Aug 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.67B
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs SKT

Header iconFRT vs SKT Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs SKTBanner chart's image
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$93.85
Change+$0.12 (+0.13%)
Volume$1.84M
Capitalization8.09B
Tanger
Price$32.34
Change-$0.13 (-0.40%)
Volume$8.53K
Capitalization3.67B
FRT vs SKT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. SKT commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Hold and SKT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FRT: $93.73 vs. SKT: $32.47)
Brand notoriety: FRT: Not notable vs. SKT: Notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 94% vs. SKT: 80%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $8.09B vs. SKT: $3.67B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $8.09B. SKT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SKT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SKT is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SKT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SKT is a better buy in the short-term than FRT.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.48% price change this week, while SKT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

SKT is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.35% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($8.09B) has a higher market cap than SKT($3.68B). SKT has higher P/E ratio than FRT: SKT (36.90) vs FRT (23.73). SKT YTD gains are higher at: -2.236 vs. FRT (-13.481). SKT has less debt than FRT: SKT (1.65B) vs FRT (4.6B).
FRTSKTFRT / SKT
Capitalization8.09B3.68B220%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.481-2.236603%
P/E Ratio23.7336.9064%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash18.6MN/A-
Total Debt4.6B1.65B279%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs SKT: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
SKT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5472
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
526
SMR RATING
1..100
6954
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8530
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4536

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRT's Valuation (72) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SKT (91). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to SKT’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (52). This means that SKT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's SMR Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (69). This means that SKT’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (60). This means that SKT’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (85). This means that SKT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTSKT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRFMX15.000.02
+0.13%
Sarofim Equity
GSIMX22.710.02
+0.09%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
MXREX12.02N/A
N/A
Empower Real Estate Index Inv
CBSCX55.61-0.44
-0.79%
ClearBridge Select R
RLAIX20.46-0.17
-0.82%
T. Rowe Price Latin America I

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
-0.90%
KIM - FRT
86%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
KRG - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
AKR - FRT
82%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
BRX - FRT
82%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
More

SKT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKT has been closely correlated with SPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SKT jumps, then SPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKT
1D Price
Change %
SKT100%
-1.46%
SPG - SKT
74%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
BRX - SKT
73%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
MAC - SKT
73%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
FRT - SKT
69%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
KIM - SKT
67%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
More